Second off, when thinking of what is or is not authentic literature or diverse/multicultural literature is not an easy or simple task. I think that many people view what is or is not in personal views. Sims Bishop brought up a very interesting point, he argues that "logically, the body of multicultural literature includes literature from all the cultures. Therefore, multicultural children's literature is the same as children's literature. Then why do we need a separate term?" (Sims Bishop, 6) I agree with his questioning of needing a separate term but understand as well as why it does help to have one. Which Cai argues that "multicultural literature is still a much needed separate category of literature, for its existence poses a challenge to the domination of all- White literature" (Cai, 316). I think it is too hard for one to say what is or is not authentic when dealing with diverse and multicultural literature.
Lastly, I believe that it is important for the information in the literature, whether it is written by an "insider" or "outsider" to the specific culture, to be well researched, filled with facts, portrays accurate illustrations or pictures, and stays away from stereotypes or negative views. As long as those are followed, it does not matter if an insider or outsider to the culture is the author or illustrator to a specific story or text.
No comments:
Post a Comment